The caption “Philip ‘Banker’ Bunce, looking like a right plonker” genuinely made me laugh out loud. Love how you mix brilliant one-liners into serious commentary.
The caption would also be apt every time we have to suffer a photo of Andrea Dworkin. Maybe feminists are skating on thin ice, criticising appearance...
Did Andrea Dworkin represent every woman in looks? Do all men look like Brad Pitt? Do all trans identified men look like Blaire White? Your comment, along with the article title quote, is completely meaningless. Andrea Dworkin was an actual women, irrespective of what she looked like. Baire White will always be a man, nomatter what he looks like.
The title only emphasises the fact that men from the female impersonators community have done the most in 'extreme' cosmetic surgery to allow them to impersonate a woman eg facial feminisation surgery that shaves off significant parts of the skeletal skull to manipulate and feminise the face. Something Andrea Dworkin never had to do, being an actual woman. Andrea Dworkin was a real and living example of being your true authentic self. Au naturelle. There's beauty in that fact alone.
Yes and all men should look like Chris Hemsworth and if they don’t I will therefore label them as beneath contempt and not representative of actual men.
You poor nitwit. Can't imagine a criticism of appearance as anything other than a sexist rating of how sexually attractive the speaker finds the person? Your sexism is severely narrowing your intellect and you hav e missed the point entirely.
Hi Sarah, lovely to hear from you. Yes, I imagine you'd find it confusing, but anyone who takes the time to check out our blog pieces on you since 2013 won't find your confusion confusing:
Very nice of you to have paid so much attention to me, and I'm sure everything you've written lives up to the high standards of accuracy required to caption every photo of Andrea Dworkin as "Philip 'banker' Bunce".
It's amazing that Munroe Bergdorf can be declared a champion for empowering women. He's only a champion of empowering women to shut up or face his narcissistic wrath. Same goes for the other coq en froq mentioned in this piece.
Excellent summary. These awards embody unfairness and make words lose their meaning. What surprises me is how willing these people are to embrace being celebrated for something they haven't achieved. Maybe scrap these awards for zero achievement and start again. There are plenty of real women who do great work.
Interestingly, most women I know, however confident or assertive they may be, would be embarrassed to pretend they could do an important job without any relevant qualifications. But then I guess women tend to be different from over-confident men in that regard.
If you find the time to think to trans people in toilets, changing rooms, prisons and hospitals, I guess you have a lot of time of your life to waste. Is it all so obvious and simple, then why all this rage, rivers of words on women or men being real, or not? Ah yeah.. maybe we don't know exactly. We don't know if women are real. Are you real? Because if you are, it will, otherwise it will die, in any case.
'If you find the time to think to trans people in toilets, changing rooms, prisons and hospitals, I guess you have a lot of time of your life to waste.'
But you are here wasting your time thinking about 'other people' that you don't know, who are thinking about these issues that are impacting their lives?🤔 I guess you have even more time to waste than the people you are criticising.
Focus and concentrate on stopping wasting your own time. Don't waste your time thinking about other people.
Typical alli, also living in a fantasy world. Did you get your DEI points for being a handmaiden for the MEN who are definitely real men who have male DNA and chromosomes that are real. Maybe you should have a stay in the grippy sock resort if you are having trouble with delusional thoughts and not knowing what is real.
If "Man of the Year" was a thing, would trans men would win it? It isn't though, or at least I don't think so. It does seem harder to name prominent trans men, for all the exponential rise of them among human females over the past decade or so. Why? Is it because, for some weird reason, like totally unrelated to biology, they don't win men's sporting events? Or is it because they don't win "Man of the year" because there's no such thing?
if you are a trans woman there are a few things that you need to understand. First of all is that you are still a man because you can't change your biological sex. It's okay to dress any way you wish and to adopt any superficial, stereotypical attributes of women that you desire. Live your life. No one should care, I certainly don't. However, because women are entitled to be treated fairly and to enjoy privacy from men there are certain things that are prohibited to you and me because we are men. You can't compete against women in most sports because it would be unfair. You can't go into women's private places like restrooms and locker rooms because that would make them feel unsafe. Finally, if you are a criminal you certainly can't be imprisoned with women.
For every transwoman advanced over cis-gendered women, there are countless women advanced over men (in recruitment and promotion terms) regardless of merit. The CEO of Aviva plc, Amanda Blanc, recently revealed (boasted?) to a parliamentary committee than no senior appointments of white men can be made to her company without the prior approval of her and the Head of Human Remains (another woman, what are the chances?):
This racist and sexist discrimination against white men is surely a breach of the Equality Act, and what response do feminists have? None, they clearly approve of it.
Numerous professions have declined in effectiveness and efficiency in recent decades as a result of the preferential hiring of women over men. Doctors, teachers, police officers, prison officers...
In 2012 I gave evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries of the already well-established causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline:
Feminist hysteria over a few transwomen is absurd when compared with their public silence in relation to the systemic discrimination against men in general, and white men in particular.
I love that you project that feminism is about being against men, when you clearly run a campaign that makes being “for men” purely about being against women.
'Artificially advancing women inevitably leads to a decline in standards, how could it not? '
This 'assumes' that the women hired/taken on for the roles lack the required credentials for those roles ie qualifications, intellectual capacity and skills based experience needed to do a good job in the role. Hence the decline, right? Therefore, you are getting an inferior being in a role that would have faired better if it had gone to the white man that it would have automatically gone to 'but for' the diversity initiative.
It's the exact same argument, thinking and myth that is used 'very effectively' against non-white people when it comes to inclusive, diversity initiatives. It is always inferred that the person lacked the qualifications (whereas they had exemplary qualifications that went over and above), that they were less than mediocre intellectually (whereas in reality they come within the category of the academic and intellectual elite) and that they were only let through the doors, as a charity case and really have no place being there at all.
Whereas the reality is a lot of very mediocre, white men have been hogging those roles for themselves, for centuries, just on the basis they were white and male and that they believed they were superior to everyone else or everyone was inferior to them, to even warrant any 'equipped' person not white and male standing 'a chance' of getting hired. Hence the diversity initiatives.
"Whereas the reality is a lot of very mediocre, white men have been hogging those roles for themselves, for centuries, just on the basis they were white and male..."
Hilarious fantasy spinning. You claim to know what these white men have been doing for centuries? Do you maybe need a change of medication? Women can't even compete at the top level with men at CHESS!!!
If you're insulted by the truth - as you clearly are - then the problem lies with you, not me. Wow, a charge of misogyny, how predictable.
So, can we at least agree that companies shouldn't be seeking to appoint more women to their boards, in the light of the corporate financial decline that results?
Why do you expect feminists to advocate for men's rights? You carry on being a men's rights activist, and let feminists advocate for women. That's how activism works.
I have never expected feminists to advocate for men's rights. They demand men support them but give no support in return.
One key difference between MRAs and feminists is that the former relentlessly tell the demonstrable truth - they have to - while the latter are inveterate and shameless liars. Always have been, always will be. Women in the West have long been a privileged class, and men pay the price through assaults on their human rights. The best account of that reality may be William Collins's "The Empathy Gap: Male Disadvantages and the Mechanisms of Their Neglect" (2019). The ebook costs under £5.00.
The caption “Philip ‘Banker’ Bunce, looking like a right plonker” genuinely made me laugh out loud. Love how you mix brilliant one-liners into serious commentary.
The caption would also be apt every time we have to suffer a photo of Andrea Dworkin. Maybe feminists are skating on thin ice, criticising appearance...
Did Andrea Dworkin represent every woman in looks? Do all men look like Brad Pitt? Do all trans identified men look like Blaire White? Your comment, along with the article title quote, is completely meaningless. Andrea Dworkin was an actual women, irrespective of what she looked like. Baire White will always be a man, nomatter what he looks like.
The title only emphasises the fact that men from the female impersonators community have done the most in 'extreme' cosmetic surgery to allow them to impersonate a woman eg facial feminisation surgery that shaves off significant parts of the skeletal skull to manipulate and feminise the face. Something Andrea Dworkin never had to do, being an actual woman. Andrea Dworkin was a real and living example of being your true authentic self. Au naturelle. There's beauty in that fact alone.
Yes and all men should look like Chris Hemsworth and if they don’t I will therefore label them as beneath contempt and not representative of actual men.
Speak for yourself, Mike.
You poor nitwit. Can't imagine a criticism of appearance as anything other than a sexist rating of how sexually attractive the speaker finds the person? Your sexism is severely narrowing your intellect and you hav e missed the point entirely.
You think it would be apt to caption every photo of Andrea Dworkin as "Philip 'Banker' Bunce"? Please explain, this is very confusing.
Hi Sarah, lovely to hear from you. Yes, I imagine you'd find it confusing, but anyone who takes the time to check out our blog pieces on you since 2013 won't find your confusion confusing:
https://j4mb.org.uk/?s=Sarah+Ditum
Very nice of you to have paid so much attention to me, and I'm sure everything you've written lives up to the high standards of accuracy required to caption every photo of Andrea Dworkin as "Philip 'banker' Bunce".
Trolling as usual Mike 🙄
Quite sad that he hasn't got better things to do ...
It's amazing that Munroe Bergdorf can be declared a champion for empowering women. He's only a champion of empowering women to shut up or face his narcissistic wrath. Same goes for the other coq en froq mentioned in this piece.
He’s a champion for himself like all Narcs. The grift is off the scale.
He's a disgrace without a face. Can't call that plastic thing he's got a face. Shame on him and anyone who supports his grift.
Rage inducing. And it’s all so goddamn obvious! 🤬
unbelievable and yet it happening. Makes me so angry. Thank you for all you do
Excellent summary. These awards embody unfairness and make words lose their meaning. What surprises me is how willing these people are to embrace being celebrated for something they haven't achieved. Maybe scrap these awards for zero achievement and start again. There are plenty of real women who do great work.
They are narcissists. They don't care as long as they are getting their desperately needed supply of 'validation'.
Interestingly, most women I know, however confident or assertive they may be, would be embarrassed to pretend they could do an important job without any relevant qualifications. But then I guess women tend to be different from over-confident men in that regard.
Spot on
Frustrating as hell, but sure goes to show these types of awards have always been meaningless to those bestowing them.
Yes, it really does highlight the politics that goes into these awards.
How come transmen are not taking real men's places?
I've just realised that there is block and mute functionality on Substack. Handy.
They're all appalling
If you find the time to think to trans people in toilets, changing rooms, prisons and hospitals, I guess you have a lot of time of your life to waste. Is it all so obvious and simple, then why all this rage, rivers of words on women or men being real, or not? Ah yeah.. maybe we don't know exactly. We don't know if women are real. Are you real? Because if you are, it will, otherwise it will die, in any case.
We don't know if women are real? Every single one of us was born to a woman, so yes we know women are real.
'If you find the time to think to trans people in toilets, changing rooms, prisons and hospitals, I guess you have a lot of time of your life to waste.'
But you are here wasting your time thinking about 'other people' that you don't know, who are thinking about these issues that are impacting their lives?🤔 I guess you have even more time to waste than the people you are criticising.
Focus and concentrate on stopping wasting your own time. Don't waste your time thinking about other people.
Typical alli, also living in a fantasy world. Did you get your DEI points for being a handmaiden for the MEN who are definitely real men who have male DNA and chromosomes that are real. Maybe you should have a stay in the grippy sock resort if you are having trouble with delusional thoughts and not knowing what is real.
How many women support this movement?
If "Man of the Year" was a thing, would trans men would win it? It isn't though, or at least I don't think so. It does seem harder to name prominent trans men, for all the exponential rise of them among human females over the past decade or so. Why? Is it because, for some weird reason, like totally unrelated to biology, they don't win men's sporting events? Or is it because they don't win "Man of the year" because there's no such thing?
if you are a trans woman there are a few things that you need to understand. First of all is that you are still a man because you can't change your biological sex. It's okay to dress any way you wish and to adopt any superficial, stereotypical attributes of women that you desire. Live your life. No one should care, I certainly don't. However, because women are entitled to be treated fairly and to enjoy privacy from men there are certain things that are prohibited to you and me because we are men. You can't compete against women in most sports because it would be unfair. You can't go into women's private places like restrooms and locker rooms because that would make them feel unsafe. Finally, if you are a criminal you certainly can't be imprisoned with women.
That's it, just like me.
Thank you for gathering and sharing these facts. They are useful.
For every transwoman advanced over cis-gendered women, there are countless women advanced over men (in recruitment and promotion terms) regardless of merit. The CEO of Aviva plc, Amanda Blanc, recently revealed (boasted?) to a parliamentary committee than no senior appointments of white men can be made to her company without the prior approval of her and the Head of Human Remains (another woman, what are the chances?):
https://j4mb.org.uk/2023/12/14/aviva-ceo-amanda-blanc-and-head-of-human-remains-danielle-harmer-hate-men-in-general-and-white-men-in-particular/
This racist and sexist discrimination against white men is surely a breach of the Equality Act, and what response do feminists have? None, they clearly approve of it.
Numerous professions have declined in effectiveness and efficiency in recent decades as a result of the preferential hiring of women over men. Doctors, teachers, police officers, prison officers...
In 2012 I gave evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries of the already well-established causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline:
https://c4mb.uk/improving-gender-diversity-on-boards-leads-to-a-decline-in-corporate-performance-the-evidence/
Feminist hysteria over a few transwomen is absurd when compared with their public silence in relation to the systemic discrimination against men in general, and white men in particular.
Mike Buchanan
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS http://j4mb.org.uk
CAMPAIGN FOR MERIT IN BUSINESS http://c4mb.uk
LAUGHING AT FEMINISTS http://laughingatfeminists.com
Adolf Hitler reacts to radical feminist Julie Bindel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZjcPaBrGqI
I love that you project that feminism is about being against men, when you clearly run a campaign that makes being “for men” purely about being against women.
Thank you, Joolz.
'Artificially advancing women inevitably leads to a decline in standards, how could it not? '
This 'assumes' that the women hired/taken on for the roles lack the required credentials for those roles ie qualifications, intellectual capacity and skills based experience needed to do a good job in the role. Hence the decline, right? Therefore, you are getting an inferior being in a role that would have faired better if it had gone to the white man that it would have automatically gone to 'but for' the diversity initiative.
It's the exact same argument, thinking and myth that is used 'very effectively' against non-white people when it comes to inclusive, diversity initiatives. It is always inferred that the person lacked the qualifications (whereas they had exemplary qualifications that went over and above), that they were less than mediocre intellectually (whereas in reality they come within the category of the academic and intellectual elite) and that they were only let through the doors, as a charity case and really have no place being there at all.
Whereas the reality is a lot of very mediocre, white men have been hogging those roles for themselves, for centuries, just on the basis they were white and male and that they believed they were superior to everyone else or everyone was inferior to them, to even warrant any 'equipped' person not white and male standing 'a chance' of getting hired. Hence the diversity initiatives.
"Whereas the reality is a lot of very mediocre, white men have been hogging those roles for themselves, for centuries, just on the basis they were white and male..."
Hilarious fantasy spinning. You claim to know what these white men have been doing for centuries? Do you maybe need a change of medication? Women can't even compete at the top level with men at CHESS!!!
Hurling insults won't advance a weak argument. We get it, you hate women. NEXT!...
If you're insulted by the truth - as you clearly are - then the problem lies with you, not me. Wow, a charge of misogyny, how predictable.
So, can we at least agree that companies shouldn't be seeking to appoint more women to their boards, in the light of the corporate financial decline that results?
So how would you explain the causal link between increasing gender diversity on corporate boards and financial DECLINE? Again, the link:
https://c4mb.uk/improving-gender-diversity-on-boards-leads-to-a-decline-in-corporate-performance-the-evidence/
'Illiterate people? Stupid people? Children?'
It seems like you want to engage simply to argue. I did say and you did read:
'who bring not only their expertise, skills and experience to the table'.
So why respond with the ridiculessness of the groups you mentioned? Time to disengage from non-sense.
Oh Hitler is involved, must be Really Serious Work going on.
I wouldn't say he's 'involved', but the video is hilarious!!!
Your the leader of a political party sharing “hilarious!!!” Vids for the lolz and Bantz - are you a serious person or a piss take?
Why do you expect feminists to advocate for men's rights? You carry on being a men's rights activist, and let feminists advocate for women. That's how activism works.
I have never expected feminists to advocate for men's rights. They demand men support them but give no support in return.
One key difference between MRAs and feminists is that the former relentlessly tell the demonstrable truth - they have to - while the latter are inveterate and shameless liars. Always have been, always will be. Women in the West have long been a privileged class, and men pay the price through assaults on their human rights. The best account of that reality may be William Collins's "The Empathy Gap: Male Disadvantages and the Mechanisms of Their Neglect" (2019). The ebook costs under £5.00.
Ernest Belfort Bax nailed the truth about feminism 113 years ago with the publication of "The Fraud of Feminism" (1911), free download here https://j4mb.org.uk/2013/07/10/the-fraud-of-feminism-1913/.
No, Nona, no.
Take your women hatred elsewhere. Your problem not ours, bye.